These sets and their price-to-piece ratio is
completely off. The average one-part-per-ten-cents has been broken, with the Architecture sets breaking this average.
For example:
The Space Needle. 57 parts, for $19.99. Labled: Rip-Off. Why? Because the normal price for set like this should be $7.99. The same goes for the Empire State Building and John Hancock Center
Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. 208 parts, for $39.99. Labled: Steep Price. Why? Because this set has 208 parts, which, if we kept the price-to-piece ratio, this set should only be $19.99. The same price as the Space Needle.
Fallingwater. 811 parts, for $99.99. Labled: Steep Price. Why? Because this set is just a small building. Sure, it may be a nice display set, but it is more aimed at AFOLs, what child would want this except to play with a Godzilla toy and smash it? The price should have been about $79.99, even then, this set would still be at a questionable price.
__________
The question I ask is:
Why?
The sets are beautiful, and no doubt well built, but still, the prices are outrageous! The online LEGO community is very angry with the prices, and the lack of what you get for your money. As am I.
See an opinion, and a review of Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum here on Eurobricks:
http://www.eurobricks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=31763 ---
The point of this topic, however, is to share your opinion.

So, what do you think of the Architecture sets?